Evolution & Big Bang

In the broadest sense, evolution is merely change, and so is all-pervasive; galaxies, languages, and political systems all evolve. Biological evolution … is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve.

14 Respon to “Evolution & Big Bang”


  1. 2 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 4:20 am

    The fossil record provides snapshots of the past that, when assembled, illustrate a panorama of evolutionary change over the past four billion years. The picture may be smudged in places and may have bits missing, but fossil evidence clearly shows that life is old and has changed over time.
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/lines_02

  2. 3 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 4:48 am

    When scientists speak of evolution as a theory they do not mean that it is a mere speculation. It is a theory in the same sense as the propositions that the earth is round rather than flat or that our bodies are made of atoms are theories. Most people would consider such fundamental theories to be sufficiently tested by empirical evidence to conclude that they are indeed facts.
    http://anthro.palomar.edu/evolve/evolve_3.htm

  3. 4 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 4:51 am

    Objections to Big Bang theory
    Big Bang theory must be false, because something cannot come from nothing.
    Big Bang theory must be false, because explosions are destructive, not creative.
    Big Bang theory contradicts the first law of thermodynamics.
    Big Bang theory contradicts the second law of thermodynamics.
    http://www.vuletic.com/hume/cefec/

  4. 5 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 4:53 am

    The big bang theory presents an interesting meeting place for modern science and established western religion. Both groups seem happy to agree that the universe originated out of nothing in an explosion at a definite time very long ago. A few scientists may go on to assert that no further explanation of the universe is necessary, because before the big bang there was no time, so there was no “before the big bang.”
    http://www.panspermia.org/mechansm.htm

  5. 6 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 4:57 am

    Evolutionists believe in spontaneous generation:

    This is the belief that life came from non-living matter.

    Creationists believe that life was created by an intelligent supernatural being ( God ).
    http://www.samsloan.com/creation.htm

  6. 8 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 5:10 am

    Misconception: “Evolution is like a climb up a ladder of progress; organisms are always getting better.”
    http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/IBladder.shtml
    Misconception: “Evolution is not science because it is not observable or testable.”

  7. 9 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 5:17 am

    Theories of origins of life, plant and animal species, the earth & the rest of the universe
    http://www.religioustolerance.org/evolutio.htm

  8. 10 sharudin September 22, 2007 at 5:20 am

    The theory of evolution requires a very old earth — billions of years of age. A main part of this theory is the belief that fossil-bearing rock layers were laid down over an interval of hundreds of millions of years. Fossils thus represent evidence of the evolution of various species over that a very long interval.
    http://www.religioustolerance.org/oldearth2.htm

  9. 11 sharudin September 23, 2007 at 12:55 am

    Before the Big Bang, there was no such thing as matter. From a condition of non-existence in which neither matter, nor energy, nor even time existed, and which can only be described metaphysically, matter, energy, and time were all created. This fact, only recently discovered by modern physics, was announced to us in the Qur’an 1,400 years ago.
    http://www.creationofuniverse.com/html/science_01.html

  10. 12 shar September 30, 2007 at 4:18 am

    Pada saat itu dimana Alam Semesta memiliki ukuran nol, dan berada pada kerapatan dan panas tak terhingga; kemudian meledak dan mengembang dengan laju pengembangan yang kritis, yang tidak terlalu lambat untuk membuatnya segera mengerut, atau terlalu cepat sehingga membuatnya menjadi kurang lebih kosong. Dan sesudah itu, kurang lebih jutaan tahun berikutnya, Alam Semesta akan terus mengembang tanpa kejadian-kejadian lain apapun. Alam Semesta secara keseluruhan akan terus mengembang dan mendingin.
    http://awan965.wordpress.com/category/teknologi/

  11. 13 shar September 30, 2007 at 4:36 am

    saat ilmu astronomi masih terbelakang, mengembangnya alam semesta digambarkan sebagaimana berikut ini :”Dan langit itu Kami bangun dengan kekuasaan (Kami) dan sesungguhnya Kami benar-benar meluaskannya.” (Al Qur’an, 51:47)
    http://labbaik.wordpress.com/2007/05/01/keajaiban-al-quran/

  12. 14 Haf September 10, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    Istilah Big Bang pula dicipta oleh seorang saintis Britain, Fred Hoyle pada tahun 1949, merujuk kepada keadaan alam semesta ini yang pada asalnya bercantum padu, kemudian berselerak dan mengembang selepas satu letupan kuat kira-kira 13 bilion tahun dahulu.

    Pakar-pakar sains cuba membentuk keadaan Big Bang pada skala kecil di dalam terowong itu dengan memecut dan menghentam dua partikel proton hampir pada kelajuan cahaya bersamaan 300,0000 kilometer sesaat.

    “Ini adalah saat yang mengembirakan untuk fizik,” kata seorang pakar fizik di Universiti Southampton, Profesor Nick Evans.

    “Mesin itu akan membantu para saintis membongkar rahsia alam semesta. Apa yang menarik mengenai eksperimen ini adalah kami pastinya akan membuat penemuan baru,” tambahnya.

    Dari http://www.kosmo.com.my/kosmo/content.asp?y=2008&dt=0910&pub=Kosmo&sec=Dunia&pg=du_09.htm


Tinggalkan jawapan




 

Ogos 2007
I S R K J S A
    Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Blog Stats

  • 43,781 hits

Salam semua

Komen yang menggunakan nama saya Sharudin, Shar atau Pak Din, yang diakhiri dengan alamat web, selalunya adalah petikan dari alamat tersebut. Ia sebagai pautan dan tidak berkaitan dengan setuju atau tidak saya kepadanya. Semua pendapat adalah bagi tujuan kefahaman dan pendidikan.