R88 Dari TheBigView.com

Ogos 30, 2008

1. Re: Question about light

Quote:
Originally Posted by schrodinger
The hope is that this will give us a better understanding of the nature of matter and mass and eventually lead to a grand unification of the four elementary forces.

Yes it refresh my memory. TQ.

“The photon falls into the class of particles called bosons, which are believed to transmit the forces of nature. The photon is the fundamental particle which makes up light, which is one of the four fundamental forces in nature.” and “When an electron in an outer orbit is caused to make a quantum leap to a lower orbit, it must give up some energy.”

The mover that cause electron to jump up/down is heat. Interesting essence? Heat cause electon to jump, which then cause emf to exist. Heat is also involved in the Big Bang and interesting enough, Thermodynamics Laws are well established. The first being energy-matter is never created nor destroyed. It seems that at singularity, the infinite heat, cause the whole event to happen … till now.

Light is never pure in the sense that it come with heat? It look as if heat is representing the ‘code’ of the intentions or the ‘how-to’ in the running of the Universe. The 2nd Thermo Law, entropy set in. The achievement of ‘good’ cause the ‘bad’ byproduct. Again heat come in.

The the 3rd Thermo says that no heat no life! Interesting yea ….

2. Re: Question about light

Thanks a lot for the views given. I appreciate it a lot.

“It is pure energy and has no intrinsic rest mass”. Pure as in energy before it splits to the four fundamental energys?.

Right … No mass, there should be no limit to speed. But it has momentum means that there’s speed involed?

Energy is everything to create the Universe. It forms matters, emf and heat. 3 mains category that I always remember to make things (science) easy, at least for me. It seem photon is a carrier of emf, graviton the carrier of gravitional forces, how about the other two forces … their carriers? And where do we fit, heat. It’s an energy and seem to be carried by photon? from Sun to Earth? Views please. TQ.

“cannot be split into smaller particles”. Ithought we spent billion to study on superstring, that make up everything, inc quarks or lepton.

3. Re: Time

Quote:
Originally Posted by schrodinger;86333As you can see, this clearly shows that the same relationship that exists between energy and mass also exists between distance (space) and time. In the same way that mass is converted to energy, space is converted to time. Indeed, space is potential time and mass is potential energy. Alternaively, energy is kinetic mass, and [B
time is kinetic space[/b]. If you consider energy to be “real” then you must also consider time to be real. In fact, these four entities: mass, energy, space and time are the four primary dimensions which comprise our Universe and each one of them is as real as any other one.[/font]

Wow “time is kinetic space”. The only problem is kinetic mass is reversable but kinetic time is not.

“mass, energy, space and time are the four primary dimensions”. To me, its a question of WHO, WHERE, WHAT and WHEN. Don’t forget WHY. Essence is Who, existing on Where and affected by What, on the moment of When. The problem is Why? as such …

” I think after space-time dimension, we should add ‘mind’ dimension (thus creating the idea of ‘mind universe’), which is to cater for the meme as complement to gene.” – from http://www.thebigview.com/forum/show…06&postcount=2

4. Re: The Meaning…
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlatko
Man thinks that he is the center of everything, and somehow, subconsciously he thinks that he is really changing something, but in the process of contemplation the ego is cornered and mind receives glimpses of notion being insignificant. Mind can’t imagine being insignificant, that is impossible, thus the sadness and emptiness overtakes.

I’m thinking, what is the point if I do or if I don’t do something with my life? Evolution will not notice that, species will not notice that, the universe will not notice that. They are not affected weather I’m driving a nice car, weather I have a big house, weather I’m knowledgeable, weather I’m religious, weather I’m black, white, short, tall, man or a woman. Nothing is relevant compared to the big picture.

Compared to the big picture the meaning of all religions, philosophies, wars, politics etc. is becoming meaningless, purposeless.

Than the question arises: What will happen if everybody thinks this way, and drops every activity? What if all mankind suddenly falls into meditation? All activities will stop, all nonsense will stop. Everybody will seat and fall in deep relaxation. Than what?

Cheers, Vlatko

“the center of everything”, means to me ata least, as human is at the apex of Universe, creation or evolution (depending on which observation angle). The tool that differs us from the rest is our ‘sufficient level’ of mind, which in turns prodeces conciousness. I think after space-time dimension, we should add ‘mind’ dimension (thus creating the idea of ‘mind universe’), which is to cater for the meme as complement to gene.

“Compared to the big picture the meaning of all religions, philosophies, wars, politics etc. is becoming meaningless, purposeless.” I dont quite agree with this, but as we evolve, those meme (the belief things) should be blended with the reasons of believing. The law of physics is a subset to the laws of nature. Thus until we can categorise our knowledge of laws of physics as 100% of the laws of nature, then we are still in the believing stage. So we continue to evolve.

“Than what?”. So as long as we are not at either ends (not knowing anything so as we have to belief or we have known everything, so we don’t have to find proof), we as human will never be the same or lead to be doing the same things. Life is about experiencing color. The million of color available as we are all have a high degree of freewill.

5. Re: Top Ten Scientific Facts : Evolution is False and Impossible

Quote:
Originally Posted by schrodinger
Lightwave communication is adequate for our “local” area but for deep space it just isn’t up to the task. Hopefully, science will provide us with an entirely new technology which will allow for instantaneous communication over any distance. This would seem to contradict the known laws of physics and violate relativity and the speed of light, but science is constantly evolving and we certainly do not know everything! Quantum electrodynamics, and in particular quantum entanglement may be our best hope for overcoming the cosmic censoring which the speed of light imposes on us at the moment. If we can couple quantum entanglement with artificial intelligence, to make sense out of otherwise random interactions, we just might achieve what physics says is impossible while still operating within the laws of physics. The final chapter is one that will never be written as lon as there is a tomorrow.

Agree to the need of assuming “instantaneous communication” not only over any distance but the entire Universe (its the same meaning but different words, ). Communication is required when there’s need of information flow. What about if the knowlege is already there. The know-how is complete to cater from the beginning to the end. Laws of physics is a subset to the law of nature. As long as there is tomorrow, there is life. Not only for us to gather new laws but for the Universe to complete the existance.

Evolution cannot be false as its about changes. The only constant in life is changes. Without that constant there’s no life. The question is only the direction of evolution, for the better or for the worse? “Quantum entanglement” is about transforming pure energy to energies usable to conduct life. To enable and fuel life. That’s evolution. As in the big view. Do we get confused about the ways evolution work and the ‘existance or not of super being’ enabling it?

6. Re: transformation

Quote:
Originally Posted by j000han
Basically time is a movement over a possible path for the transformation cycle of matter>energy>space>energy>matter.>energy >space>matter.
…
The ‘amount’ of space that was transformed into energy>matter is relative to the path that the object(s) has/have followed.
Iow. the amount of space that is transformed into matter = the amount of matter that is transformed into space.
But surely the question then arises how can space be measured?
…
Thus the notion that consciousness originates from a material structure may well be incomplete if not entirely inaccurate.

Wow … really deep thought needed to produce those imaginations.

I observed the arguments as “do space & consciousness require energy to exist?”

Yes, as energy is define as the ability to do work. The ability to realize space & consciousness do require energy. The transformation of pure energy to the 2 entities is what I am confused to. Simplifying life, I assume that any entity E, requires A, B, C and D to make it happened, thus E = A + B + C + D.

A = The Tools and Equipments.
B = The building block or the material.
C = The procedures and methods (knowledge)
D= The Energy or amount of work done.

Views please … TQ

7. Re: Are the stars and planets in motion an energy plant?

Quote:
Originally Posted by schrodinger
[color=black]
.. There is a sum total of energy that remains constant regardless of any and all changes that might take place in the Universe.

My question is the fix amount an infine or infinite? It started as an infinitely dense singularity making the impression that there is nothingness, but a fix amount. If infinite means the space-time Universe can go on forever!

Thanks

6 Komen | DARWIN | Pautan Kekal
Dikirim oleh Pak Din 31

R87 SI “Politik Tukang Karut!”

Ogos 30, 2008
28  Dari Saifulislam.Com, Terima Kasih Ustaz.

Pak Din     August 27th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

Salam menang

1. “ala kulli haal… segala puji bagi Allah atas keputusan pilihanraya di Permatang Pauh semalam. semoga kemenangan itu menyumbang kepada perkembangan prinsip yang dimaksudkan.” Kata Usytaz. Syabas dan tahniah saya ucapkan kepada pemenang dan juga rakyat Permatang Pauh secara keseluruhan dan semua rakyat Malaysia amnya, yang mendokong sistem demokrasi beraja kita. Sudah pasti pendirian prinsip perlu selaras dengan kehendak Islam, terutamanya memahami nilai-nilai Islam, dan bukan kehendak Muslim yang akhir-akhir ini ketinggalan dalam menilai dan menambah nilai, nilai-nilai Islam dalam kehidupan.

2. Tertarik juga lontaran idea Mrs Ustaz, “nak ‘uji’ pandangan atau approach ustaz ie nk tau which side u r?”. Walaupun “which side u r?” melambangkan ada nada siapa lebih betul, namun penekanan kepada kepimpinan ala keluarga, akan memastikan kita terpaksa kembali, membuka buku nota bertajuk pertandingan yang berakhir dengan situasi “win-win”. Bukan mudah untuk mengapplikasi teori ini, tetapi kegirahan kita atau tepat lagi semangat jangka pendek kita, terkadang mempengaruhi tindakan menterjemah teori kepada pelaksanaan.

3. Kemenangan pembangkang adalah juga kemenangan penyokong. Saya sokong penuh ucapan TPM mengucapkan tahniah kepada pemenang dan mengingatkan amalan demokrasi masih sihat di negara kita. Bukan mudah untuk menyuarakan kedudukan sebegitu, kalau tidak kerana kuatnya nilai-nilai Islam tersemat di minda. Malangnya semangat ini belum turun ke akar umbi atau masyarakat bawahan, yang lebih gemar dengan tiupan semangat untuk membantu kehidupan seharian menyambut cabaran membuat keputusan. Sehinggalah kita dapat melihat, selepas pertandingan, kedua penyokong dan pembangkang masih dapat menyatukan prinsip asas walaupun perbezaan ketara di dalam isu, semasa pertandingan.

4. Anjakkan cara fikir sangat diperlukan di dalam politik di negara kita. Secara tradisinya (conservative) kepimpinan politik diasak kepada masyarakat dengan mengambil pehak kepada parti, tidak mengira prinsipnya jelas atau tidak. Anjakan yang diperlukan ialah ke arah liberalisasi, yang mengajar masyarakat kepada mengambil pehak kepada prinsip yang jelas. Tidak menjadi masaalah sekiranya pengurusan parti tidak menyelitkan sentiment kepartian semasa berkempen, tetapi malangnya itulah yang berlaku di negara ini, yang rata-rata tindakan diambil berdasarkan sentiment, semangat jangka pendek, kesilapan memilih nilai dan sebagainya.

5. Memang tidak mudah membuat perubahan kepada semangat jangka panjang. Semangat yang dibena dengan keilmuan berdasarkan kajian mendalam tentang sesuatu, berbanding semangat jangka pendek yang diterap hanya semasa berkempen yang selalunya dikaburi dengan janji kosong dan tidak jejak ke Bumi. Tanpa disedari latihan yang diperolehi semasa ghairah berkempen ini, terus menjadi amalan harian masyarakat, yang akhirnya tidak pandai merancang kehidupan dengan teliti. Kehidupan terus berdasarkan kepada pelbagai isu dan pengajaran yang tidak berbentuk pandangan jauh dan berwawasan.

6. Prinsip asas semestinya ke arah mengenali Pencipta. Islam mengutamakan Tauhid kepada Pencipta dengan mengenal sekenal-kenalnya Pencipta Alam ini. Tidak cukup dengan hanya menyebut nama dan sifat, tetapi perlu menghayati carakerjaNya dengan menterjemah pengetahuan mengenaiNya ke dalam kehidupan seharian. Betapa sempurnaNya penciptaan yang dilakukan maka itulah yang perlu dibudayakan dalam kehidupan. Betapa seniNya perancangan dan perlaksanaan carakerjaNya, maka itulah yang menjadi nilai-nilai yang diterbiahkan di dalam hasil cinptaanNya yang dinamakan Alam. Prinsip SunnahNya tidak pernah dan tidak akan berubah.

7. Semuga kemenangan pilihanraya kecil ini menjadi titik tolak ke arah meliberalisasikan pemikiran masyarakat, bukan sahaja dalam cara membuat pilihan pemimpin, malah yang lebih utama adalah ke arah keterbukaan menerima perubahan membuat pilihan berdasarkan prinsip asas dan bukan ketaasuban kepada seseorang atau parti seseorang. Politik kepartian ini menjadi lebih malang apabila nilai Muslim itu dianggap sebagai nilai Islam, sedangkan keadaan Muslim sekarang tidak melambangkan begitu. Tahniah sekali lagi kepada yang menang.

1 Komen | DARWIN | Pautan Kekal
Dikirim oleh Pak Din 31

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.