<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Komen bagi: Darwin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sharudin.com</link>
	<description>Falsafah carakerja Khaliq</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Pak Din 31</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-8732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pak Din 31]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-8732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sampai juga mengembara di sini ... Terima kasih

Setuju tu, bukan idea dia seorang sahaja. Itulah yang dinamakan evolusi. Banyak teori sains difahami secara sedikit demi sedikit. Setiap orang memberi nilai tambah, sehinggalah menjadi kepada sesuatu yang menjelaskan yang haq.

Kalau betul-betul berminat dengan teori sains ... jenguklah lagi!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sampai juga mengembara di sini &#8230; Terima kasih</p>
<p>Setuju tu, bukan idea dia seorang sahaja. Itulah yang dinamakan evolusi. Banyak teori sains difahami secara sedikit demi sedikit. Setiap orang memberi nilai tambah, sehinggalah menjadi kepada sesuatu yang menjelaskan yang haq.</p>
<p>Kalau betul-betul berminat dengan teori sains &#8230; jenguklah lagi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: eida</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-8731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eida]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 06:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-8731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bla blaja dlm kelas, kdg2 teori ni mcm btul..tp kalo nk cya memg susah..darwin bkn org first yg ckp sal teori evolusi..org first ialah lamarck..darwin cuma mengembangkn lagi idea lamarck bla die merantau dengn HMS Beagle..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bla blaja dlm kelas, kdg2 teori ni mcm btul..tp kalo nk cya memg susah..darwin bkn org first yg ckp sal teori evolusi..org first ialah lamarck..darwin cuma mengembangkn lagi idea lamarck bla die merantau dengn HMS Beagle..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Haf</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theory of Evolution dan Asmaul Husna

Dalam Surah 59:24, Allah swt berfirman,
Dialah Allah Yang Menciptakan, Yang Mengadakan, Yang Membentuk Rupa, Yang Mempunyai Asmaaul Husna. Bertasbih kepadaNya apa yang di langit dan bumi. Dan Dialah Yang Maha Perkasa lagi Maha Bijaksana.

Al-Khaliq - Maha Pencipta
Al-Bari&#039; - Maha Penjadi
Al-Musawwir - Maha Pembentuk Rupa

Teori evolusi menyatakan bahawa evolusi adalah proses perubahan dalam trait yang diwarisi dalam sesebuah populasi organism dari satu generasi ke generasi yang lain.

Dalam surah 24:45, Allah menyebut, 
Dan Allah telah menciptakan semua jenis hewan dari air...

Maka tidaklah mustahil bagi Allah untuk evolution itu berlaku kerana antara nama-nama Allah itu adalah Al-Musawwir, Maha Pengevolusi/Pembentuk Rupa

Dari http://www.iluvislam.com/v1/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=98&amp;thread_id=1772&amp;pid=27735#post_27735]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theory of Evolution dan Asmaul Husna</p>
<p>Dalam Surah 59:24, Allah swt berfirman,<br />
Dialah Allah Yang Menciptakan, Yang Mengadakan, Yang Membentuk Rupa, Yang Mempunyai Asmaaul Husna. Bertasbih kepadaNya apa yang di langit dan bumi. Dan Dialah Yang Maha Perkasa lagi Maha Bijaksana.</p>
<p>Al-Khaliq &#8211; Maha Pencipta<br />
Al-Bari&#8217; &#8211; Maha Penjadi<br />
Al-Musawwir &#8211; Maha Pembentuk Rupa</p>
<p>Teori evolusi menyatakan bahawa evolusi adalah proses perubahan dalam trait yang diwarisi dalam sesebuah populasi organism dari satu generasi ke generasi yang lain.</p>
<p>Dalam surah 24:45, Allah menyebut,<br />
Dan Allah telah menciptakan semua jenis hewan dari air&#8230;</p>
<p>Maka tidaklah mustahil bagi Allah untuk evolution itu berlaku kerana antara nama-nama Allah itu adalah Al-Musawwir, Maha Pengevolusi/Pembentuk Rupa</p>
<p>Dari <a href="http://www.iluvislam.com/v1/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=98&#038;thread_id=1772&#038;pid=27735#post_27735" rel="nofollow">http://www.iluvislam.com/v1/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=98&#038;thread_id=1772&#038;pid=27735#post_27735</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Sha</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about natural selection?

After the fossil record, the second supporting pillar of evolution offered by Darwinists is natural selection, which they hoped biologists would confirm. &quot;Just as the breeders selected those individuals best suited to the breeder&#039;s needs to be the parents of the next generation,&quot; explained British philosopher Tom Bethell, &quot;so, Darwin argued, nature selected those organisms that were best fitted to survive the struggle for existence. In that way evolution would inevitably occur. And so there it was: a sort of improving machine inevitably at work in nature, &#039;daily and hourly scrutinizing,&#039; Darwin wrote, &#039;silently and insensibly working . . . at the improvement of each organic being.&#039; 

&quot;In this way, Darwin thought, one type of organism could be transformed into another—for instance, he suggested, bears into whales. So that was how we came to have horses and tigers and things—by natural selection&quot; (&quot;Darwin&#039;s Mistake,&quot;The Craft of Prose, Robert Woodward and Wendell Smith, editors, 1977, p. 309). 

Darwin saw natural selection as the major factor driving evolutionary change. But how has this second pillar of evolutionary theory fared since Darwin&#039;s day? In truth, it has been quietly discarded by an increasing number of theorists among the scientific community. 

Darwin&#039;s idea that the survival of the fittest would explain how species evolved has been relegated to a redundant, self-evident statement. Geneticist Conrad Waddington of Edinburgh University defines the fundamental problem of advocating natural selection as a proof of Darwinism: &quot;Natural selection . . . turns out on closer inspection to be a tautology, a statement of an inevitable although previously unrecognized relation. It states that the fittest individuals in a population . . . will leave most offspring&quot; (p. 310). 

In other words, the answer to the question of which are the fittest are those that survive, of course. And which ones survive? Why, naturally, the fittest. The problem is that circular reasoning doesn&#039;t point to any independent criteria that can evaluate whether the theory is true. 

Dari http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/EV/complexity.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about natural selection?</p>
<p>After the fossil record, the second supporting pillar of evolution offered by Darwinists is natural selection, which they hoped biologists would confirm. &#8220;Just as the breeders selected those individuals best suited to the breeder&#8217;s needs to be the parents of the next generation,&#8221; explained British philosopher Tom Bethell, &#8220;so, Darwin argued, nature selected those organisms that were best fitted to survive the struggle for existence. In that way evolution would inevitably occur. And so there it was: a sort of improving machine inevitably at work in nature, &#8216;daily and hourly scrutinizing,&#8217; Darwin wrote, &#8216;silently and insensibly working . . . at the improvement of each organic being.&#8217; </p>
<p>&#8220;In this way, Darwin thought, one type of organism could be transformed into another—for instance, he suggested, bears into whales. So that was how we came to have horses and tigers and things—by natural selection&#8221; (&#8220;Darwin&#8217;s Mistake,&#8221;The Craft of Prose, Robert Woodward and Wendell Smith, editors, 1977, p. 309). </p>
<p>Darwin saw natural selection as the major factor driving evolutionary change. But how has this second pillar of evolutionary theory fared since Darwin&#8217;s day? In truth, it has been quietly discarded by an increasing number of theorists among the scientific community. </p>
<p>Darwin&#8217;s idea that the survival of the fittest would explain how species evolved has been relegated to a redundant, self-evident statement. Geneticist Conrad Waddington of Edinburgh University defines the fundamental problem of advocating natural selection as a proof of Darwinism: &#8220;Natural selection . . . turns out on closer inspection to be a tautology, a statement of an inevitable although previously unrecognized relation. It states that the fittest individuals in a population . . . will leave most offspring&#8221; (p. 310). </p>
<p>In other words, the answer to the question of which are the fittest are those that survive, of course. And which ones survive? Why, naturally, the fittest. The problem is that circular reasoning doesn&#8217;t point to any independent criteria that can evaluate whether the theory is true. </p>
<p>Dari <a href="http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/EV/complexity.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/EV/complexity.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Mil</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is evolution? It&#039;s a simple question, but there are dozens of answers. Here is the first problem in the evolution/intelligent design debate—how to agree on the meaning of the terms. 

Evolution can mean something as simple as &quot;change over time,&quot; or it can be an all-encompassing explanation of the entire universe, as Sir Julian Huxley once postulated: &quot;The earth was not created; it evolved. So did all the animals and plants that inhabit it, including our human selves, mind and soul as well as brain and body. So did religion&quot; (The Humanist Frame, 1961, p. 18). 

As you can immediately see, the implications of what he said on our worldview and beliefs are enormous. This is why it is so important to establish the right definitions about the issue at hand. In Lewis Carroll&#039;s Alice in Wonderland sequel Through the Looking Glass, the fantasy character Humpty-Dumpty said, &quot;&#039;When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.&#039;&quot; So definitions can be very subjective—and sometimes deceptive. 

One of the deceptions used by many proponents of evolution is the &quot;bait-and-switch&quot; tactic. It begins with a simple, noncontroversial definition that can be agreed upon, and later the definition is switched to mean something quite different. 

Dari http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn76/theory.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is evolution? It&#8217;s a simple question, but there are dozens of answers. Here is the first problem in the evolution/intelligent design debate—how to agree on the meaning of the terms. </p>
<p>Evolution can mean something as simple as &#8220;change over time,&#8221; or it can be an all-encompassing explanation of the entire universe, as Sir Julian Huxley once postulated: &#8220;The earth was not created; it evolved. So did all the animals and plants that inhabit it, including our human selves, mind and soul as well as brain and body. So did religion&#8221; (The Humanist Frame, 1961, p. 18). </p>
<p>As you can immediately see, the implications of what he said on our worldview and beliefs are enormous. This is why it is so important to establish the right definitions about the issue at hand. In Lewis Carroll&#8217;s Alice in Wonderland sequel Through the Looking Glass, the fantasy character Humpty-Dumpty said, &#8220;&#8216;When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.&#8217;&#8221; So definitions can be very subjective—and sometimes deceptive. </p>
<p>One of the deceptions used by many proponents of evolution is the &#8220;bait-and-switch&#8221; tactic. It begins with a simple, noncontroversial definition that can be agreed upon, and later the definition is switched to mean something quite different. </p>
<p>Dari <a href="http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn76/theory.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gnmagazine.org/issues/gn76/theory.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Pak Din</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pak Din]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.imamrsc.com/v1/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=86&amp;Itemid=34

Kami ImamRSC.com mengalu-alukan ahli yang berbakat dalam bidang penulisan - sama ada dalam bentuk karya kreatif, blog mahupun artikel dan kajian-kajian ilmiah untuk menerbitkan karya anda di Laman Web ImamRSC.com ini!

Untuk submit, anda boleh login ke ImamRSC.com dan ambil pilihan &quot;Submit Article&quot; di bahagian panel sebelah kiri anda! Ataupun anda juga boleh menghantar melalui emel di alamat This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imamrsc.com/v1/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=86&#038;Itemid=34" rel="nofollow">http://www.imamrsc.com/v1/index.php?option=com_content&#038;task=view&#038;id=86&#038;Itemid=34</a></p>
<p>Kami ImamRSC.com mengalu-alukan ahli yang berbakat dalam bidang penulisan &#8211; sama ada dalam bentuk karya kreatif, blog mahupun artikel dan kajian-kajian ilmiah untuk menerbitkan karya anda di Laman Web ImamRSC.com ini!</p>
<p>Untuk submit, anda boleh login ke ImamRSC.com dan ambil pilihan &#8220;Submit Article&#8221; di bahagian panel sebelah kiri anda! Ataupun anda juga boleh menghantar melalui emel di alamat This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Pak Din</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pak Din]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Dalam membahaskan dalil-dalil di atas, kita hendaklah mengikut kaedah dan usul al-Qur’an dan hadis yang betul. Dari segi matan (teks) al-Qur’an dan hadis yang dijadikan dalil tidak ada satu pun bukti bagaimana bentuk penghormatan atau salam diterangkan. Maka, di sinilah punca perselisihan di kalangan para ulama’. Di dalam tulisan Dr Mohd Asri sendiri tidak menyatakan bagaimanakah ucapan yang diharuskan untuk memberi dan menjawab salam bukan Islam. Kita ingin bertanya bagaimanakah bentuk dan caranya berdasarkan nas al-Qur’an dan hadis itu? Adakah ianya hanya ucapan ‘selamat pagi’ atau ‘selamat sejahtera’ dan adakah boleh kita memberi salam dengan kalimah assalamu ’alaikum, assalamu ‘alaikum warahmatullah atau assalamu ‘alaikum warahmatullahhi wabarakatuh’? 

2. Terdapat hadis-hadis yang menunjukkan larangan memberi dan menjawab salam kepada orang bukan Islam seperti berikut: - 

Pertama: Dari Abu Hurairah (radiallahua’anh) Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) bersabda yang maksudnya; “Janganlah memulakan ucapan salam kepada Yahudi dan Nasrani dan jika kamu bertemu dengan mereka di perjalanan, tolaklah mereka ke arah sudut yang sempit”. (Hadis Muslim) 

Kedua: Dari Qatadah, dari Anas bin Malik (radiallahua’anh) bahawa sahabat Nabi (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) telah bertanya kepada baginda: “Bahawa ahli kitab (Yahudi dan Kristian) memberi salam kepada kami, maka bagaimana kami membalasnya? Baginda menjawab: Jawablah dengan ucapan wa’alaikum”. (Hadis Muslim, Abu Daud, an-Nasai dan Ibn Majah) 

Hadis di atas jelas menyatakan bahawa orang Islam tidak boleh memulakan salam kepada Yahudi, Kristian dan orang-orang Musyrikin. Ucapan salam menumbuhkan perasaan kasih sayang, tetapi berkasih sayang di antara orang kafir adalah dilarang sama sekali. Al-Qur’an menyebutkan bahawa, “Kamu tidak akan mendapati kaum yang beriman kepada Allah dan hari akhirat, saling berkasih sayang dengan orang-orang yang menentang Allah dan RasulNya...” (al-Mujaadilah, ayat 22). Sebagai gantinya, ucapan yang menjadi kebiasaan boleh digunakan.

Dari http://al-ahkam.net/home/modules.php?op=modload&amp;name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=22108&amp;ez=2%20target=_top]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Dalam membahaskan dalil-dalil di atas, kita hendaklah mengikut kaedah dan usul al-Qur’an dan hadis yang betul. Dari segi matan (teks) al-Qur’an dan hadis yang dijadikan dalil tidak ada satu pun bukti bagaimana bentuk penghormatan atau salam diterangkan. Maka, di sinilah punca perselisihan di kalangan para ulama’. Di dalam tulisan Dr Mohd Asri sendiri tidak menyatakan bagaimanakah ucapan yang diharuskan untuk memberi dan menjawab salam bukan Islam. Kita ingin bertanya bagaimanakah bentuk dan caranya berdasarkan nas al-Qur’an dan hadis itu? Adakah ianya hanya ucapan ‘selamat pagi’ atau ‘selamat sejahtera’ dan adakah boleh kita memberi salam dengan kalimah assalamu ’alaikum, assalamu ‘alaikum warahmatullah atau assalamu ‘alaikum warahmatullahhi wabarakatuh’? </p>
<p>2. Terdapat hadis-hadis yang menunjukkan larangan memberi dan menjawab salam kepada orang bukan Islam seperti berikut: &#8211; </p>
<p>Pertama: Dari Abu Hurairah (radiallahua’anh) Rasulullah (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) bersabda yang maksudnya; “Janganlah memulakan ucapan salam kepada Yahudi dan Nasrani dan jika kamu bertemu dengan mereka di perjalanan, tolaklah mereka ke arah sudut yang sempit”. (Hadis Muslim) </p>
<p>Kedua: Dari Qatadah, dari Anas bin Malik (radiallahua’anh) bahawa sahabat Nabi (sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam) telah bertanya kepada baginda: “Bahawa ahli kitab (Yahudi dan Kristian) memberi salam kepada kami, maka bagaimana kami membalasnya? Baginda menjawab: Jawablah dengan ucapan wa’alaikum”. (Hadis Muslim, Abu Daud, an-Nasai dan Ibn Majah) </p>
<p>Hadis di atas jelas menyatakan bahawa orang Islam tidak boleh memulakan salam kepada Yahudi, Kristian dan orang-orang Musyrikin. Ucapan salam menumbuhkan perasaan kasih sayang, tetapi berkasih sayang di antara orang kafir adalah dilarang sama sekali. Al-Qur’an menyebutkan bahawa, “Kamu tidak akan mendapati kaum yang beriman kepada Allah dan hari akhirat, saling berkasih sayang dengan orang-orang yang menentang Allah dan RasulNya&#8230;” (al-Mujaadilah, ayat 22). Sebagai gantinya, ucapan yang menjadi kebiasaan boleh digunakan.</p>
<p>Dari <a href="http://al-ahkam.net/home/modules.php?op=modload&#038;name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=22108&#038;ez=2%20target=_top" rel="nofollow">http://al-ahkam.net/home/modules.php?op=modload&#038;name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=22108&#038;ez=2%20target=_top</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Ismi  Nailofar</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ismi  Nailofar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Novel Saga ditulis oleh pelopor teori persuratan baru, Mohd Affandi Hassan. Faisal tehrani telah menulis novel Tuhan Manusia dengan fakta dan wacana ilmiah yang menarik, sesuai dengan teori persuratan baru. 
Gelintar komentar tentang Tuhan Manusia menggunakan enjin carian, dan Pak Din pasti tergerak hati membacanya.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Novel Saga ditulis oleh pelopor teori persuratan baru, Mohd Affandi Hassan. Faisal tehrani telah menulis novel Tuhan Manusia dengan fakta dan wacana ilmiah yang menarik, sesuai dengan teori persuratan baru.<br />
Gelintar komentar tentang Tuhan Manusia menggunakan enjin carian, dan Pak Din pasti tergerak hati membacanya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Ismi  Nailofar</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ismi  Nailofar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saya baru perasan yang Pak Din ada hantar mesej terbaru. Terima Kasih.
Setakat ini, memang saya seorang penulis bebas. terima kasih kembali atas doanya...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saya baru perasan yang Pak Din ada hantar mesej terbaru. Terima Kasih.<br />
Setakat ini, memang saya seorang penulis bebas. terima kasih kembali atas doanya&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Oleh: Ismi  Nailofar</title>
		<link>http://sharudin.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ismi  Nailofar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sharudin.wordpress.com/darwin-asal/#comment-1192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saya baru sahaja upload. Sila lihat. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saya baru sahaja upload. Sila lihat. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

