There are places in the universe that we will never be able to travel to within the laws of physics. So it seems to me that in a non intelligent design manor(i am an atheist) that the matter in the universe so distant to us should probably be of some use.

I guess i just find it easy to imagine myself traveling upwards in size from subatomic particles to the atom, then to matter which we can see, on to large bodies like planets and outwards to the universe and if that is not the boundary then outward beyond its sphere to another dimension possibly consisting of mostly empty space as well. Perhaps with many universes spread out rotating and revolving around each other and so on.

Like I said im a physics layman so this may in fact be some sort of theory or law. I would definitely love some feedback or maybe some recomended reading on the subject.

From http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/brian_greene_on_string_theory.html

Dari http://www.discovery.org/a/6401

Setuju dengan pandangan sdr, “terjadi oleh suatu zat atau jisim mutlak” dan dengan kuasa tenagaNya Dia mencipta “sesuatu yang tidak wujud kepada wujud”.

“4. Sebelum wujudnya alam ini, iaitu sebelum azali (t=0, yang wujud masih hanya zat Allah. Walaupun Allah telah menciptakan alam, penciptaan itu tidak menyebabkan adanya satu entiti/zat yang layak dipanggil wujud, kerana yang wujud pada hak (pada zat) hanyalah Allah. Allah bersifat wujud dan hanya dia yang wujud sebenar. Wujud yang lain tidak boleh dikategorikan sebagai sebenar. Sebab itu timbulnya ‘wujud pada nama’, ‘wujud seperti bayang-bayang’ dan pelbagai lagi wujud yang bukan wujud hakiki, untuk menerangkan wujud selain Allah. Kita tidak dapat meletakkan dua wujud ini ditahap yang sama, kerana perbezaannya.” – dari http://sharudin.wordpress.com/2007/10/05/32/

Some of the reasons for the acceptance of Darwin’s theory involved conditions of the time. The 19th century was an era of social and religious unrest. Science was riding a crest of popularity. Impressive discoveries and inventions appeared constantly. This climate was conducive to people embracing revolutionary concepts.

Furthermore, Darwin himself had an impeccable reputation as a dedicated naturalist. And though his theory contained many obvious weaknesses, these were hidden by the length and tediousness of his book. (He described his book as “one long argument.”)

At the same time, the Roman church was being affected by its own cumulative mistakes about science as well as the critics’ onslaughts against its teachings and the Bible. The church itself began to accept supposedly scientific explanations over divine ones. A bias against the supernatural slowly crept in.

The momentum grew in the 20th century until many Protestants and Catholics turned to theistic evolution. This is the belief that God occasionally intervenes in a largely evolutionary process through such steps as creating the first cell and then permitting the whole process of evolution to take place or by simply waiting for the first man to appear from the gradual chain of life and then providing him with a soul.

“Darwinian evolution to them,” says Dr. Hayward, “is merely the method by which God, keeping discreetly in the background, created every living thing . . . The majority of theistic evolutionists have a somewhat liberal view of the Bible, and often regard the early chapters of Genesis as a collection of Hebrew myths” (p. 8).

Dari http://www.gnmagazine.org/booklets/EV/wrongassumptions.htm

Dari http://www.thebigview.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3334

Evolution is fascinating because it attempts to answer one of the most basic human questions: Where did life, and human beings, come from? The theory of evolution proposes that life and humans arose through a natural process. A very large number of people do not believe this, which is something that keeps evolution in the news.

Dari http://science.howstuffworks.com/evolution.htm

If they continue to be segregated, each race will continue to compete with the other races in the struggle for existence, and finally, the fittest will survive. The rise of modern evolutionary theory took place mostly in Europe, especially England and Germany.

Europeans and Americans were then leading the world in industrial and military expansion, giving them an edge on the other nations of the world.

This concept was tremendously encouraged by the concurrent rise of Darwinian evolutionism and its simplistic approach to the idea of struggle between natural races, with the strongest surviving and thus contributing to the advance of evolution.

Nineteenth-century scientists, most of who were subscribed to the evolution of man, were thus also convinced of racism.

Charles Darwin himself was convinced of white racial superiority. He wrote on one occasion as follows:

The more civilized so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of lower races has been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world. (Himmelfarb 343)

Dari http://www.readingislam.com/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1216208030411&pagename=Zone-English-Discover_Islam%2FDIELayout